80 points
October 31, 2008
October 29, 2008
Catena malbec 2006
83 points
Chile. 13.9%
A touch too much volitile acidity for me. However in its favour the alcohol is restrained (ish) and not sweet.
October 24, 2008
Vinea Marson Syrah 2005
77 points.
Heathcote, Victoria. 14%
Dark crimson unfiltered. Strange nose marred by mercaptan. Palate also weird concoction. Oh dear, otherwise it seems very promising in weight and balance. The next day raisin flavours come to the fore – yuck.
I’d like to think this is just one bad bottle, or perhaps batch.
St Hugo Cabernet 2000
85 points
Coonawarra, South Australia. 13%
I enjoyed this wine which was really odd to me, it’s so different from Bordeaux. Pungently 100% Cabernet with distinctive minty regional characteristics on a concentrated ever so slightly syrupy one dimensional wine. Lot’s of flavour, sweet berry Cabernet.
October 18, 2008
Bernard Faurie Hermitage ‘Le Greffieux’ 2000
91 points
Northern Rhone, France. 13%
Strong flavoured medium bodied dry wine. Quite a contrast from more viscous New World Shiraz. Fine wine. Should drink well over the next 8 years.
October 14, 2008
Puygueraud 2004 and 1998
This was a surprise. The 2004 is the better wine, and that’s not accounting for the age difference.
The 1998 is in good condition, and is showing some influence of age but not much in the way of improvement. It makes me wonder if this wine really benefits from age. There are certainly many wines that do not benefit from age, but this sort of wine rarely features on this blog. Puygueraud is serious wine, but after 4-5 years it should start to be consumed, there is little return from aging it (though it will last). Anyway, that’s my verdict for the moment.
October 11, 2008
Chateau Grand Puy Lacoste 1985
92 points
Pauillac, Bordeaux. 12.5%
Lovely rather classic left bank claret. Nice tiny touch of green on a fairly concentrated wine – very food oriented style. And yet the charm of 1985 vintage style means this is more accessible than many serious Pauillacs.
Very good wine, although I have to say it held no surprises (no disappointments either).
October 9, 2008
Mildara Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon 1998
88 points
Coonawarra, South Australia.
Nice juicy sweetish fruit in a minty green style. Quite refreshing cool climate Cabernet. Simple but nice. Perhaps a tad too sweet.
October 8, 2008
Plaisir De Merle Shiraz 2001
83 points
Paarl, South Africa. 14%
Sweet soft not concentrated. This wine hasn’t gained with age. Nice varietal flavour though mild.
Jacob’s Creek Johann Shiraz Cabernet 2001
89-92 Points
Apparently a blend of Barossa Shiraz and Coonawarra Cabernet though the regions aren’t mentioned on the label. 14%
The top wine from the Jacob’s Creek (formerly Orlando) stable. Very dense, hugely concentrated. Barely opening up now at 7 years old. Not a blockbuster it may even develop elegance with age. There should be more shiraz cabernet blends.
It’s an interesting wine, and I expect it to gain in character but it doesn’t sing to my soul. I prefer more relaxed elegant pure wines.
Marc Brédif Vouvray 1995
94 points
Loire Valley, France. 12%
I think I’m in love. I’m a sucker for Chenin Blanc especially from the Loire, especially with age. What a great service Brédif do in releasing aged wines from good vintages – the last (still on shelves) was the 1986, while this 1995 is a better vintage.
Gold with green hints. Gorgeous complex mingled toast, mineral and fruit aromas.
Succulent charming palate. Has the weight and complexity of a great Riesling with the more gentle but equally complelling flavours of Chenin. Superb wine, a bargain.
October 4, 2008
Shiraz tasting
Larry and I organized a small tasting designed to look at the diversity of wines produced with this grape. They were all modestly priced Shiraz of about 6-8 years of age. From Australia, France, South Africa and New Zealand. Australia was most represented with wines from different states and regions.
Apart from a staggering 3 faulty corks the wine quality was very good, not a dud amongst them. There was considerable difference in style though, as was hoped. The St. Joseph stood out being savoury dry with far less syrup/alcohol characters. The Peter Lehmann Barossa was at completely the opposite spectrum, and also very good in its style. While the South African was a pleasant surprise, possibly the best wine there (if it develops as it should).
Tardieu-Laurent vieilles vignes Saint-Joseph 2000
Rhone, France. 13%
88 points
Nice smoked meats aromas. Savoury lean-ish nice Rhone. Showed surprisingly well in the New World company. It’s not a great Rhone and yet compared to the other wines it appeared distinctly vinous, unforced and unadulterated. Good with food.
Seppelt Chalambar Shiraz 2001
Grampians/Bendigo, Victoria. 14%
85 points
Rich with some up-front sweetness but rather drying out on the finish.
The alcohol isn’t high but it’s noticeable- out of balance. Chalambar is impressive in its youth but it doesn’t seem to come together with age. Click here for reviews of other vintages.
Luddite Shiraz 2001
92 points
Western Cape, South Africa. 14%
Concentrated. Sort of a Rhone Australia cross. Some smoked meats, a bit closed/dumb but optimistically this could be very good.
Impressive concentration. A bit too dense and closed now, stood out in this respect compared to other wines in the tasting.
Houghton Frankland River Shiraz 2001
86 points
Western Australia. 14.5%
Classic Australian shiraz flavours in a medium structure. Good quality commercial wine.
Showed much better than when I last had this wine.
Peter Lehmann Eight Songs shiraz 2001
91 points
Barossa Valley, south Australia. 14%
Very good sweet smooth Barossa Shiraz quite sumptuous.
October 1, 2008
Chateau Malescasse 2004
88 points
Haut Medoc, cry bourgeois.
Lovely fresh classic claret. Modern but not in a sweet shiny way.
When prices go silly
Yesterday I was offered a bottle of Trinity Hill 2006 Homage Syrah, which I turned down, due to the $170 price tag. “I can buy buy 2005 Hermitge (e.g. Jaboulet La Chapelle) for that price”. “Good point” said the wine retailer “though the Trinity Hill is a nice wine”.
“I’m sure it is” I replied “but it’s very young and with no history, who knows if it will turn out as well as the wine show judges hope”.
Why the ridiculous price ? Because it won top wine at the 2007 NZ Wine Awards and presumably it is made it miniscule quantities. It will all sell out in the brief blaze of publicity it receives. There is real novelty in a Shiraz topping the NZ wine show.
Beware of (briefly) famous wines – they wil never offer value.