88+ points
Médoc. Cru Bourgeois. 13.5%
A random buy from a supermarket. Aromas of fresh sawdust that breathe off. Dark, young claret but a little bit sumptuous. Will be very good drinking in 3 years or so. Bargain.
88+ points
Médoc. Cru Bourgeois. 13.5%
A random buy from a supermarket. Aromas of fresh sawdust that breathe off. Dark, young claret but a little bit sumptuous. Will be very good drinking in 3 years or so. Bargain.
82 points
Vin de Pays de la Cité de Carcassonne. 12.5%
An intruiging blend of 50% Cab/Merlot with Grenache, Cinsault and Alicante gives a lifted slightly herbal nose. A somewhat dilute wine (to be expected I suppose given the price) with some nice fresh crunchy acidity. Lacks the depth of the similarly priced wines from Gerard Bertrand.
90++ points
Pauillac. 13%
Every wine critic speaks highly of Pontet-Canet today. It’s the new Leoville Las Cas, that is, it’s regularly compared to the first growths. In which case this vintage is a bargain.
Well to the wine. It’s super concentrated cassis and new oak, but with a freshness that is more like Hawkes Bay NZ than California. It’s different than much Bordeaux I drink because it is just so young and concentrated. Best left until nearer 2020. If you bought this en primeur you got one of the best Bordeaux deals this decade.
82 points
Medoc. 14%
Very disappointing. Much closer to their 2003 than to the lovely vibrant 2002. Dense ripe wine. Perhaps it will open with time but I suspect this is just too extracted.
Reviews of other vintages of D’Escurac.
88+ points
Haut-Medoc, Bordeaux, France. 13%
A 5th growth from the Haut-Medoc. A new name to me. Old fashioned yet well made – what I mean is that this isn’t souped up at all. No signs of modern fruit sweetness here. Strong slightly hard green flavours but not under-ripe. Flavour wise this reminds me of the 1996 vintage in general and I’ve just bought some Cantemerle 96 so the comparison will be interesting.
This 2004 should be a long distance runner. From 2015.
88 points
Coteaux du Languedoc, France. 13%
I’m not a huge fan of Rhone whites and even less so of their New World imitators. That said I have tasted many.
I’m happy drinking this though. A savoury characterful wine. Inexpensive.
A blend of 30% Bourboulenc (never heard of it before) 30% Roule 25% Grenache Blanc 15% Rousanne.
PS I’ve just recalled that I am a huge fan of Chateau Tahbilk’s Marsanne from Victoria Australia. Not that these two wines are similar I just thought I should modify my above statements.
88 points
After some rather hard young 2008 white Bordeaux this is a pleasant change. It’s the first that tastes to me clearly like white Bordeaux. Maybe it’s more Semillion, maybe it’s another year in bottle, maybe it’s just that they aren’t trying to emulate a kiwi Sauvignon.
Nice touch of lanolin character.
91 points
Pauillac, Bordeaux. 13%
I suspect that 2nd wines of the classed growths will be particularly delicious in 2005. This certainly is. Spicy smoky oak flavours on top of classic berry Cabernet. In the elegant slightly green Grand-Puy-Lacoste style. Gorgeous. Bought for a low price in a French supermarket.
90 points
Quite a surprise. I think this is the best French chardonnays I’ve tasted outside of Burgundy. And nothing from Burgundy comes close at twice the price. A bit oaky at present but this will pass.
Reminds me of the new wave of cool climate Australian chardonnays.
From a high elevation (450 metres) site near the Pyrenees.
88+ points
Saint-Chinian, France. 13.5%
An 80% Syrah 20% Grenache blend. Far less classic Southern wine than the Gerard Bertrand Minervois this is more inky in colour, tighter dense fruit, little in the way of spicy southern tannins, more acid. It’s quite an impressive wine but better in a few years. Saint Chinian is an interesting area for potentially fine wines.
80 points
A rare disappointment from the Loire. Sweet, low acid. Nice but without character.
90+ points
Saint Emilion, Grand Cru. 13,5%
Didn’t quite have the fleshy richness I was expected for 2005. Not that it is in anyway thin, but rather it is very fresh with nice acidity, very clean fruit and oak (not sweet). A young wine set for a fairly long life. I expect it will take on richness as it ages but will retain elegance. Quite modern but quite classy too. A name to remember. Reminds me stylistically of Chateau Magdelaine.
84+ points
Cotes de Castillon, Bordeaux, France. 14%
60% Merlot, 30% Cab France, 10% Cab Sav
Pretty one-dimensional, rich but dense. Not thrilling. Try again in 2011.
87 points
Serve & Maine, Loire, France. 12%
I continue to believe that Loire Muscadet is one of the most under-rated wines – partly because most end up selling for a couple of Euro in French supermarkets. This wine didn’t cost much more, yet after being open for a day turned into a wine of some richness. A dry food oriented wine. Bargain.
90 points
Margaux, Bordeaux, France. 13%
Quite an accessible style, sort of like Ferriere, with exotic sweet smokey oak on some elegant, rich, loose knit fruit. Very enjoyable now, though I expect it will calmly age a further 10 years (to 2019). These 2004 Margaux are some of the best value classed growths around.
88 points
Premieres Cotes de Blaye, Bordeaux, France. 13.5%
Marc Pasquet – viticulteur a Plassac, Gironde, France.
This is the sort of quality minor Bordeaux that can be wonderful value, but many I find a bit extracted, sometimes a bit hard. But in 2005 I suspect that many of the best will be like this with a more solid core of fleshy, slightly sweet fruit, giving a really well balanced friendly if forthright and quite strong wine.
This has a lovely spicy note on the nose, almost Southern French. Wonderful value. Stong wine but still good drinking now and over the next 5 years (to 2014).